グミ の山 12 月 3 週
◆▲をクリックすると長文だけを表示します。ルビ付き表示

○自由な題名
◎根

○The Complete Man(感) 英文のみのページ(翻訳用)
The Complete Man

After his marriage to Princess Elizabeth and following her accession to the throne as Queen Elizabeth ? in 1952, Prince Philip's many interests and his sympathetic understanding of present-day problems were reflected in the speeches he made on public occasions. The speech quoted here is characteristic of his clear vision and of his ability to combine courtesy and plain speaking.
In the Middle Ages it was the Church and the universities which were primarily responsible for knitting together the nations of Europe in a common culture. This amounted to a system of thought and behaviour, conditioned by a reverence for the classics and restrained by religion and social custom. Two world wars and the advent of science have completely upset those conditions and removed those restraints. So far we have neither returned to them nor put anything in their place. The responsibility of the universities is therefore much greater today if they are to minister to the specialized needs of modern society and to regain their position as the spiritual and moral reservoirs of Europe and the world.
One of the marks of the Middle Ages was the free movement of scholars from university to university across the face of Europe. Since then the world has grown much smaller and that mobility ought in our day to cover the whole world. Teachers in the arts must surely benefit from a wide personal knowledge of the places where those arts flourished most nobly, and the science teacher must surely draw inspiration from working in the universities which were responsible for some of the greatest strides in science. Perhaps even more important, the movement of teachers and students alike between universities must surely help to break down the narrow nationalism which grows up with isolation. A proper respect for the achievements of others may not be easy in this competitive world, but it is after all the first step towards a broad mind.
European culture, thought, and ideas have drifted all over the world, and although they have received some hard knocks in recent years there are many far-away places where people still believe that Europe has something good to offer. We shall have nothing to offer unless our behaviour, our ideals, and our achievements gain universal respect. We can only have something to offer if the universities have clearly before them what they are aiming to do.
With the inevitable growth of specialization I see the universities facing two great dangers. First, it is very easy to get so involved in the technical details of education that the object of education is lost. And secondly, in an effort to condition a university to the needs of its students and to the needs of the State it may lose its power to make or mould those students into reasonable and responsible men, capable of thinking for themselves and capable of expressing the result of their thoughts to others.
A university must do more than merely provide a high-class professional apprenticeship. It does not matter in the least what a student's specialized line happens to be; the fact that he is a specialist cannot excuse him from his responsibilities as a man. Students must emerge as complete human beings capable of taking their proper place in society as a credit to their universities both for their professional knowledge and as men. There is no conflict between the disciplines here. Nobody can be termed a complete man who has no knowledge of what science has to teach, and, equally, human obligations cannot be escaped on the grounds of being a specialized scientist or technologist.
By human obligations I mean the ability to behave in a reasonable way, to observe restraint so that restraints do not have to be imposed, to be able to think clearly and objectively so that false doctrines cannot gain ground. I believe that it also means the ability to see through nonsense, political, economic, scientific, and so on, and the feeling that it is a duty to resist it. This in no way conflicts with the amount of specialized knowledge, whether scientific, classical, or anything else, which the student can absorb and turn to good account for himself and the community at large.
The universities have a special responsibility to send people of that sort out into the world, because by their influence and example in the community at large they can extend the work of the universities to every corner of the world.
However, to produce the complete man with that balanced sense of obligation and understanding we need to know much more about man himself. Our knowledge of science, the classics, or medicine is beautifully documented, indexed, and ordered. We may not know everything about the subject, but what is known is neatly bound. I imagine that is why we sometimes call this an age of reason, but we forget that -- in the midst of all that reasonable knowledge -- man himself remains as unreasonable, irrational, and unpredictable as ever
Everything around us has been found to have laws and order, and there are some who faintly resent the fact that man refuses to be ordered in the same way. But we must take care not to treat man, with his immense variety of prejudices and emotions, as just another statistical unit. There is the conflict; and it is perhaps inclined to become most noticeable in scientists who deal with ordered things and thoughts in their professional lives, but when the problems are human ones it is not altogether surprising that their ideal solutions are not universally accepted. The reverse is, of course, also true. If you spend your life making compromises it is hard to understand why that is not possible in science.
I would like to repeat that the conflict is not between disciplines, between humanism and science. The conflict lies between man and the world he has made for himself. Man has succeeded in changing many things but he has not changed much himself. It is just because we have got such a grip on nature and such a store of knowledge for its own sake that we must remember the central character, man, and his possibilities, limitations, and the depths he can sink to if he relaxes his self-control.

Prince Philip, Duke of Edinburgh: from Selected Speeches (1955).

★日本人にはボランティア精神が(感)
 【1】日本人には、ボランティア精神が希薄で、ボランティアのシステムを社会的に定着させるのは困難ではないかとの意見がある。しかし、私は決してそうは思わない。
 【2】アメリカの場合、ボランティア精神、相互扶助精神が非常に発達していて、成人の二人に一人は、なんらかのボランティア活動に従事しているといわれる。
 なぜ、アメリカではそんなに発達しているのか、これにはいくつかの要素がある。
 【3】キリスト教というバックボーンがあるということもある。各地域に教会があって、日曜日には、年代を超えたたくさんの人たちが集まり、そこに地域の輪ができる。
 教会で牧師さんの説教を聞き、清らかな心になると、なにかいいことをしたくなる。【4】情報交換の場にもなり、どこそこの誰かが困っているといった情報なども教会を介してみんなに伝わる。こうして教会を中心にしたボランティアの輪が、各地域に広がっていく。
 【5】もっと具体的な要素は、時間的なゆとりがあるということであろう。
 日本人の年間労働時間は、二千時間を超えている。サービス残業や、夜間、休日などの仕事仲間とのつき合い、接待などを入れれば二千数百時間になるだろう。【6】それに対しアメリカでは千九百時間、ドイツでは千六百時間を切っているし、勤務時間以外は、彼らは完全に自由である。つまり、彼らには時間的余裕がたっぷりあって、そうなると人の本性として、人に良いことをしたくなってくる。
 【7】その上、建国以来、自分たちの手で社会をつくってきたという伝統がある。また、いろいろな民族が入り交じっているから、お互いに個人を尊重しあい、協調していかないとやっていけないという状況もある。【8】これだけの条件が揃っているため、アメリカではあれほどボランティアが発達しているのだと思う。
 それに対して、確かに日本は、キリスト教のバックボーンもないし、みんなが集まる地域の場もない、時間的余裕もない。【9】お先真っ暗ではないか、と考えるのも無理はないかもしれない。
 しかし、宗教的な要素でいえば、熱心な信者であるかないかにかかわらず、日本人には伝統的に仏教的なフィーリングがある。習慣∵や年中行事の中にも、仏教は色濃く残っている。
 【0】根本精神でいえば、キリスト教の場合は、イエス・キリストに象徴されるように自己犠牲を旨としている。したがって、まったくの手弁当で全面的に奉仕する。そこからなんの見返りも期待しない。
 一方、仏教の基本原理は因果応報の考え方にある。ここで助けておけば、いずれ自分が困ったときには助けてもらえるだろうというように、広い意味での見返りをなんとなく期待する。これは別に悪いことではなく「困ったときはお互いさま」という考え方だから、相互扶助の精神である。ここに日本的なボランティア活動が根づく地盤があると思う。
 もともと日本人は、農耕民族である。機械化以前の農耕というのは、一人ではやっていけない。集落が一つの単位となり、季節ごとの農作業を総出で行って収穫を平等に配分するということだから、基本的には助け合いのシステムである。そうした精神は、いまもわれわれの潜在意識の中に残っている。
 そして、最近は時間的ゆとりもかなり出てきた。かつては労組の要求は賃上げ一本だったが、いまでは勤務時間短縮も合わせて強力に要求するといったように変わってきた。週休二日制もいきわたってきた。日本もこれからだんだんゆとりの世界に入っていく。
 だから、ボランティア活動をするための条件は、日本でも熟し始めていると思う。ただ、これも農耕民族の特徴だが、突出を嫌う意識があって、自分から旗を振って組織をつくったり、みんなに呼びかけたりすることが苦手である。
 テレビなどで助け合いの提唱をすれば、あっという間に何千万円もの義捐金(ぎえんきん)が集まる。このように、もともと助け合いの精神をもった民族だから、各地にそうした組織をつくり必要な場所を提供してゆけば、そこにみんな集まってくるようになるだろう。それが時の流れだと思う。

(「再びの生きがい」堀田力より)